Our essence is rooted in being honest and straight forward. We advise and advocate what we truly believe.
Our team and collective efforts allow free flow of information and knowledge from top to bottom and vice versa.
Teamwork is rooted in affluence DNA and we very much acknowledge the outcome of team work.
We firmly believe that Confidentiality is the cornerstone of our Profession and strive to maintain it to the fullest possible extent.
We believe that the simplest solution is the best one.
We understand only our profession and we are devoted to it. We are cent percent committed to the delivery of quality services to our clients.
Explore the latest GST Update, judgments and news for January 2024! Stay updated on important developments in Goods and Service Tax to keep informed.
Kavin Hp Gas Gramin Vitrak Vs The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes(2023-VIL-896-MAD)
The issue at Hand:
In this case, a petitioner involved in the trade of Petroleum Gases encountered complications regarding the belated claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) owing to financial constraints. The tax authorities rejected the ITC asserting that the delay in submitting GSTR-3B (tax returns) lacked a valid justification.
The petitioner contended that technical hurdles arose as the prescribed Form GSTR-2, designed for ITC claims, was not officially taken into implementation. The unavailability of the said form incapacitated the petitioner to file the claims electronically. The court acknowledged these challenges and underscored the absence of a functional mechanism for ITC claims.
Ultimately, the court overturned the tax authorities’ decisions, highlighting the unavailability of GSTR-2, which hindered electronic filing. It directed the authorities to permit manual returns and reassess ITC claims. The court emphasized the necessity of adopting a practical approach, particularly in the absence of a well-established system.
The key takeaways from this case include the struggles the petitioner faced in promptly claiming ITC due to technical issues and the non-existence of necessary forms. The court emphasized the significance of addressing practical challenges by allowing manual returns when electronic filing is not viable. The ruling underscores the need for a more accessible system for ITC claims, taking into account the real-world difficulties encountered by businesses.
The dispute pertaining to reversal of ITC in case of default in payment of tax by supplier is settled?
In the recent judgment pronounced by the Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Ballygunje and Others Vs Suncraft Energy Pvt. Ltd. [2023-VIL-99-SC], Apex Court dismissed the SLP filed by the department against the Calcutta High Court judgment. In this case, Calcutta HC passed an Order in favor of the assessed against which the department had gone into appeal before SC. The said decision of HC is discussed below.
Summary of HC judgment:
Suncraft Energy Private Limited and another Vs The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge & others [2023-VIL-487-CAL]
In this case, the department disputed the ITC claimed by the petitioner on the ground that neither the supplier’s invoices were reflected in GSTR-2A of the Appellant nor the supplier had remitted the tax collected. Petitioner in its support has submitted a copy of tax invoices along with a bank statement substantiating the payment to said vendor. Also, the petitioner submitted that the department has not conducted any inquiry on the supplier particularly when the clarification (Press release dated 18 October 2018) was issued that furnishing of outward supplies in Form GSTR-1 by the supplier and the facility to view the same in Form GSTR 2A by the recipient is in nature of taxpayer facilitation and does not impact the ability of taxpayers to avail ITC on the self-assessment basis in consonance with provisions of Section 16 of CGST Act.
Honorable High Court accepting the contention of the petitioner held that the department without resorting to any action against the supplier has completely ignored the tax invoices and bank statements submitted by the petitioner and therefore this action by the department is arbitrary. Therefore, before directing the petitioner to reverse the ITC and remit the same to the Government, the department ought to have taken action against the supplier. Hence, HC accepted the writ and held that the demand raised on the petitioner in this case is non-sustainable and to be set aside.
Being aggrieved by this Order, the department had filed the SLP before the Apex Court.
Position after the above judgment:
In light of the above judgment, the immediate question that comes to mind is whether the issue pertaining to the reversal of ITC in case of default in payment of tax by vendor is settled.
To answer the above, we need to consider the following positions:
Hence, at this stage, it is difficult to conclude that the issue pertaining to the reversal of ITC in the case where the supplier has not remitted the tax to the Government is settled. Therefore, it will be crucial to track the positions which HC may take now in light of the above-referred judgments.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information existing at the time of preparation and we take no responsibility to update it with the subsequent changes in the law. The article is intended as a news update and Affluence Advisory neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this article. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on specific facts and circumstances. This article does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncement
CLICK HERE DECEMBER GST UPDATES
People are our greatest asset and we believe in our people. Our multi disciplinary team would always go that extra mile to ensure that all the client deliverables are prepared within agreed time frame to technical standards and presentational quality. Our success is greatly dependent on quality and performance of our people.