Regulatory Framework – Liability of Independent Director

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements), Regulations, 2015 [SEBI LODR]:

Regulation 25(5) of SEBI LODR states as follows, “An independent director shall be held liable, only in respect of such acts of omission or commission by the listed entity which had occurred with his [/her]  knowledge, attributable  through  processes  of board  of  directors,  and  with  his [/her]  consent  or connivance or where he [/she]  had not acted diligently with respect to the provisions contained in these regulations. This provision states that independent Directors would be held liable for acts of omission or commission by listed entity:

  1. When Independent Directors were aware of that particular act
  2. It was done by listed entity with the consent or connivance of Independent Directors
  3. If the act of omission or commission was pursuant to a transaction or an act which was discussed and approved at committee and board meetings
  4. Independent Directors had not acted diligently with respect to provisions contained in these regulations.

In addition to above SEBI LODR principles casts responsibility on entire Board of Directors with respect to performance of their duties.

Companies Act, 2013:

Section 149(11) of Companies Act 2013 also has same provisions as is mentioned in Reg. 25 (5) of SEBI LODR. So even if Independent Directors are not involved in the day-to-day activities of the company but if any act of commission or omission by the listed entity falls within the counters of Reg 25(6) or Section 149 then it is seen that role of Independent Directors might be questioned by enforcement agencies.

Recent amendments – More onus on Independent Directors:

Recently SEBI LODR was amended whereby it is now mentioned that Related Party Transaction in Audit Committee would be approved by Independent Directors only.


In furtherance to what we have seen above we would now have a look at recent cases where role of Independent Directors was questioned. It is being seen that SEBI has been questioning role of Independent Directors wherever cases were falling within the counters of Reg 25(6) of SEBI LODR or Section 149(11) of Companies Act. We would see some noteworthy precedents were role of Independent Directors was questioned:

SEBI Adjudication order in the matter of Edserv Softsystems Ltd:

In this case SEBI has not levied penalty on Independent Directors as they exercised due diligence while exhibiting their duties. In this case Edserv Softsystems Ltd had acquired a company in UAE. This transaction was not approved by Board of Directors. Independent Directors on seeing this news through Stock Exchange Disclosure questioned the company on the acquisition, why board approval was not taken, valuation report details as to how price of acquisition was determined and source of this acquisition. Edserve Softssystemsa refused to given information even after persistent follow ups by Independent Directors. Independent Director’s finally resigned from the company. SEBI in this case has not penalized Independent Director. SEBI has stated as follows, “I see that Notice Nos.  3 and 4 have certified the authenticity of the July 25, 2011 Board Resolution, a fact which has not been denied by them. However, it has been asserted by the said Notices that they were not aware of the Pledge Agreement, whereby the GDR proceeds were pledged as security for the loan taken by Vintage.  Further, from the email exchanges, it appears that the utilisation of the GDR proceeds for acquisition of M/s Alta Vista, a company incorporated in the UAE, was without concurrence of the board of directors of the Company.  As regards the second question of due-diligence exercised, I note from the above that Notice Nos.  3 and 4 had actively sought information and details from S. Giridharan (Notice No. 1), the Chairman and CEO of the Company regarding the utilisation of the GDR proceeds and the acquisition of Alta Vista FZE, a company incorporated in the UAE.  I also note that after the email dated November 06, 2012, whereby information was sought from S. Giridharan, with respect to the utilisation of GDR proceeds, T.  S.  Ravichandran, Notice No. 3 and S. Arvind, Notice No. 4, resigned as a Director of the Company on December 10, 2012 and January 28, 2013 respectively. Upon a holistic view of the facts, I am inclined to grant the benefit of doubt to Notice Nos.  3 and 4, especially in view of the diligence exhibited by them with respect to the utilisation of the GDR proceeds followed by their decision to step down from the Board of Deserve, soon thereafter”

SEBI Adjudication Order in the matter of Bombay Dyeing Ltd:

In this as alleged by SEBI there were certain fraudulent transactions were being entered by Bombay Dyeing Ltd with one their group companies. Further it is also alleged that the group structure was maintained in such a manner that these transactions would not be highlighted. SEBI in this matter has stated as follows, “I note that the Notices had an important role to play as members of the Audit Committee and as a sub group of the Board of Directors. The Notices were required to monitor the disclosures and accuracy of the same as a monitor of the process. As a result of the Notices’ failure to discharge their function as members of the audit committee, BDMCL was able to inflate its sales and profits with respect to its real estate segment to the tune of Rs. 2,492.94 crores and Rs. 1,302.20 crores respectively. In view of the above, I find that the Notices have failed in its duty to exercise oversight of BDMCL’s financial reporting process and disclosure of its financial information to ensure that the financial statement is correct, sufficient and credible. Therefore, I hold that the Notices have violated the provisions of Clause 49(II)(D)(1) of the Listing Agreement, Clause 49(III)(D)(1) of the Listing Agreement (post amendment dated April 17, 2014) read with Regulation 103 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 and Regulation 18(3) read with Clause A (1) under Part C of Schedule II of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 for the period from FY 2014 –15 to FY 2017 -18”

Conclusion: Whether an Independent Director would be liable or not in a for a particular act or omission would depend on the facts of each case. But it is necessary that Independent Directors shall perform their duties diligently.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information existing at the time of preparation and we take no responsibility to update it with the subsequent changes in the law. The article is intended as a news update and Affluence Advisory neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this article. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on specific facts and circumstances. This article does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncement



Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. is established with the vision to provide one stop solutions to clients needs in ever changing environment. Affluence is managed by specialized team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Corporate Lawyers and Other Professionals committed to provide quality experience to our clients in the widest spectrum of business needs.

Recent Posts

April 1st, 2023
SEBI has approved following amendments in its Board Meeting
March 27th, 2023
Common and simplified norms for processing investor’s service requests by RTA’s and norms for furnishing PAN, KYC details and Nomination
March 23rd, 2023
Additional affirmations by Practicing Company Secretaries (PCS) in Annual Secretarial Compliance Report
March 20th, 2023
Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending in India
March 17th, 2023
Regulatory Framework – Liability of Independent Director
March 15th, 2023
Social Stock Exchange (SSE) – Fund Raising Platform for “Not for Profit Organizations” (NPO)
March 13th, 2023
MSME Registration Benefits – Tax and Others
March 10th, 2023
Link PAN with Aadhaar by March 31: SEBI direction to Investors
March 8th, 2023
Importance of Credit Score
March 6th, 2023
Closure Of The Company – Various Exit Modes Of Voluntary Winding Up
March 2nd, 2023
FAQ’s on Social Stock Exchange
March 2nd, 2023
Latest Key Amendments Effective from April 01, 2023
February 25th, 2023
Consultation Paper On Strengthening Corporate Governance At Listed Entities By Empowering Shareholders – Amendments To The SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015
February 24th, 2023
National Pension System (NPS) – Additional Tax Saving Option
February 20th, 2023
Tax Deduction and Documentation for Salary – AY 2023-24
February 13th, 2023
SEBI Consultation paper on review of Corporate Governance norms for a High-Value Debt Listed Entity dated February 08, 2023
February 9th, 2023
SEBI revamps buyback methods and provisions relating to buybacks
February 7th, 2023
SEBI circular on achieving min public shareholding
February 3rd, 2023
Off Market transfer of shares without consideration is not allowed – SEBI
February 2nd, 2023
Informal Guidance to proposed to be listed company – Extending share based employee benefits to employees of a subsidiary company
February 1st, 2023
Generating Awareness on the availability of Disputes Resolution Mechanisms at Stock Exchanges against Listed Companies / Registrar to an Issue and Share Transfer Agent
January 30th, 2023
Remuneration paid to Directors of the Listed Entity – Series 3
January 25th, 2023
Upgradation of E- Forms in tune with V3 portal
January 23rd, 2023
SEBI Notification dated 17/01/23 | Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023
January 19th, 2023
Remuneration paid to Non-Executive Directors of Public Company – Series 2
January 16th, 2023
Remuneration paid to Whole Time Directors of Public unlisted Companies
January 11th, 2023
Relaxation from compliance with certain provisions of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015
January 9th, 2023
Online registration of units through MCA portal for ESI registration and inspection of units in this regard
January 6th, 2023
Guidance given by Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) on creation of ‘Suspense Escrow Demat Account’
January 5th, 2023
Change in Single Master Form (SMF) on FIRMS Portal
January 3rd, 2023
Relaxation with respect to conducting of Extra Ordinary General Meetings and Postal Ballots
December 30th, 2022
MCA extension for conducting Annual General Meetings through Video Conferencing or other Audio Visual Means (‘OAVM’)
December 23rd, 2022
Web-based Form DPT-3 as per New Rules
December 13th, 2022
Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) on Corporate Social Responsibility (‘CSR’) expenses
December 7th, 2022
GSTR 9 and 9C – Optional to Mandatory reporting in FY 2021-22
September 27th, 2022
CSR Compliances as per New Rules 2022
September 20th, 2022
Mandatory appointment of Company Secretary
September 17th, 2022
Amendment To The Definition Of Small Company And Benefits
September 16th, 2022
Obligation to Indicate Director Identification Number (DIN)
September 7th, 2022
RBI issues Digital Lending Guidelines: Banks / NBFC