Author: Ankit Baid, Research Analyst at Affluence Advisory
In a strong and timely advisory, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has urged Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)—including Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) and Housing Finance Companies (HFCs)—to cultivate a ‘compliance-first’ culture. This call to action, issued last week, underscores the importance of strict adherence to fair practice codes and a genuine approach toward addressing customer grievances. The RBI’s move reflects the increasing regulatory scrutiny aimed at ensuring that NBFCs prioritize the protection of consumer interests while building sustainable and resilient business models.
RBI’s Caution against Aggressive Growth Strategies
RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, in his address on last week, raised alarms over a few NBFCs that appear to be pursuing aggressive growth strategies without developing adequate business practices or risk management frameworks. These NBFCs, he warned, have portfolios that have become more complex and larger in scale, and their rapid expansion may not be fully supported by robust safeguards.
The governor highlighted that this aggressive growth often stems from significant capital inflows—both domestic and international. While access to capital is crucial for scaling businesses, it has, in some cases, pushed NBFCs to chase growth under investor pressure. This quest for expansion, he noted, must not come at the cost of stability or ethical financial practices.
Unsustainable Practices and the Risk to Financial Stability
One of the major concerns expressed by the central bank was the trend of NBFCs charging excessively high interest rates, coupled with steep processing fees and unjustified penalties. Governor Das pointed out that this practice is further exacerbated by what he referred to as a “push effect.” In these instances, business targets are driving retail credit growth, rather than the actual demand for credit.
This can lead to an unhealthy build-up of high-cost debt and over-indebtedness among borrowers, posing risks not just to the companies themselves, but also to the wider financial system.
“Such practices,” Governor noted, “could foster a deteriorating work culture and poor customer service.” He emphasized the importance of NBFCs adopting sustainable business goals, adhering to a compliance-first culture, and establishing strong risk management frameworks. Moreover, he called for NBFCs to sincerely address customer grievances and strictly follow the fair practices code. NBFC’s can solidify its position by further strengthening and investing in:
- Risk Management and Robust Frameworks
- Ethical Financial Practices
- Customer-Centric Approach
- Strong Governance and Compliance
- Balanced Capital Infusion
- Monitoring Market Trends and Economic Conditions
- Technology and Cybersecurity
- Responsible Lending Practices
The Role of Compensation and Incentive Structures
Governor Das also touched on the need for NBFCs to revisit their compensation practices, particularly variable pay and incentive structures. He observed that some companies appear to have incentive programs driven purely by targets, potentially compromising long-term stability and ethical practices. The governor’s comments in this regard could be seen as a reflection of concerns also echoed in global financial markets, particularly in China, where excessive focus on growth and targets has led to systemic risks.
Stress in Unsecured Loan Segments
After the micro-loan exhibited pressure and in addition to concerns about growth strategies, the RBI has expressed particular worry about certain segments within the NBFC sector, particularly unsecured loans such as those for consumption, microfinance, and credit card debt. These loan segments are prone to stress with rising delinquency, especially in challenging economic environments, and the central bank has indicated that it is closely monitoring these areas. Any signs of distress will be met with appropriate regulatory interventions as needed.
Also Read: Microfinance Companies Explained: A Simple Guide
The Need for Rigorous Underwriting and Monitoring
The governor also called on both banks and NBFCs to carefully assess their exposure to these high-risk segments, paying close attention to the size and quality of their portfolios. The governor emphasized that underwriting standards must remain stringent, and post-sanction monitoring must be thorough to avoid potential pitfalls. He pointed out that this is particularly important in today’s rapidly evolving financial landscape, where the risks associated with digital fraud, cybersecurity breaches, and misuse of inoperative deposit accounts—often referred to as “mule accounts”—are becoming more pronounced.
Looking Ahead: A Call for Responsible Growth
As the Indian financial sector evolves, the role of NBFCs remains vital in extending credit to underserved segments of the population. However, the RBI’s recent guidance serves as a reminder that growth must be responsible and accompanied by strong governance practices. Building a culture of compliance, prioritizing risk management, and focusing on fair customer treatment are essential for ensuring long-term success and financial stability.
Moving forward, NBFCs must balance their ambitions for growth with their responsibilities to customers and the financial system at large. Failure to do so could lead to systemic risks that undermine the progress made by the sector in recent years. The RBI, through its ongoing supervision and advisories, remains committed to ensuring that the sector grows in a sustainable and secure manner.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information existing at the time of preparation and we take no responsibility to update it with the subsequent changes in the law. The article is intended as a news update and Affluence Advisory neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this article. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on specific facts and circumstances. This article does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncement
CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD PDF